AI Search Rank

Sample Audit · Live Demo

Here's what an audit sees. Then watch it fix it.

This is a real audit layout for a sample brand — a mid-size project-management SaaS. No signup, no edits. Scroll to see exactly where it's losing to AI, and the fixes the platform writes automatically.

Primary diagnosis

GEO

Competitors get cited, you don't

Your content is well-structured, but you lack the third-party authority signals AI trusts. This is a GEO problem, not a content problem.

Focus here

Authority building — get cited by the external sources AI already pulls from in your category.

Don't waste time on

Don't keep restructuring your pages. You're already strong there; more content won't move the needle.

auditing flowstack.io vs 3 competitors Cited check

// Query tested: "best project management software for remote teams"

ChatGPT

Not cited

Names 3 competitors. FlowStack absent from the answer entirely.

Perplexity

Mentioned

Listed 6th, no citation link. Competitors cited with sources.

Claude

Not cited

No mention. Recommends two rivals by name with reasoning.

Gemini

Cited

Cited once, ranked below the category leader. Room to climb.

Discoverability

41/100

Clarity

68/100

Authority

39/100

Trust

86/100

// Share of Voice: 12% · category leader: 47% · 9 gaps detected

Other tools stop here. Ours writes the fix.

Every gap below comes with remediation the platform generated — not a to-do, the actual work. Here are the top three of nine.

High

No comparison content for "remote teams"

Competitors own the head-to-head pages AI pulls from. FlowStack has none, so it's never in the answer.

Est. SoV cost

−14%

AI-written fix

Content brief · ready to publish "FlowStack vs the field: project management built for remote teams" — a comparison page structured for AI retrieval: explicit feature table, plain-language verdict per use-case, schema markup for FAQ. Target the 8 sub-queries AI expands this into. Draft outline + 1,200-word body generated.

✎ Brief written 📊 Success metric: SoV +9–14% → Added to 90-day plan

High

Thin authority signals on remote-work topic

AI weights cited sources. FlowStack has no third-party references tying it to "remote work" authority.

Est. SoV cost

−11%

AI-written fix

Pitch email · ready to send Outreach drafted to 5 remote-work publications proposing a data study ("How 2,000 distributed teams run standups"). Subject line, body, and the angle each outlet is most likely to accept — personalised per publication. Builds the citations AI reads as authority.

✉ 5 emails drafted 📊 Success metric: 3+ citations → Added to 90-day plan

Medium

Answer-unfriendly product page structure

Key facts are buried in marketing copy. AI can't extract a clean answer, so it skips to a competitor that's easier to quote.

Est. SoV cost

−7%

AI-written fix

Action plan · ready to assign Restructure the top product page for extraction: lead with a one-sentence answer to "what is FlowStack," add a scannable feature/limit table, surface pricing in text (not an image), and add FAQ schema. Step-by-step checklist generated, ordered by impact.

✓ 7-step checklist 📊 Success metric: Clarity 68→85 → Added to 90-day plan

Monitoring tools

"You're cited 12% of the time. Here's your dashboard."

AI Search Rank

"You're cited 12% of the time. Here are nine fixes, already written. Start with these three."

Your real audit is 60 seconds away.

Run it on your own brand. See where you're losing to AI — and walk away with the fixes already drafted.

Run Your Free Audit → Back to home

Free · No credit card · 4 platforms scanned

Sample data shown for demonstration. Your audit uses live AI-platform analysis of your real brand.